Further Inaccuracies

In response to the recent blog post, we have identified which investor this was and there are again several inaccuracies. He was never told there would be a bond as to issue a bond certificate we would need to be FSA regulated which we are not nor ever have been. I have personally never told anyone they would have a bond certificate contrary to some investors now claiming this. 

We have spoken to the relevant party this evening about 2 things:

1. The 'bond' he was allegedly promised.

2. Investment into assets.

1. With regards to the bond, we have asked the gentleman to provide us with the necessary paperwork or any correspondence at all that would indicate he was getting 'a bond', he doesn't have any. We asked him who he spoke to when he was told he was 'getting a bond', his response was 'your company', there were no specific names given as to who had 'told him this'. The contract the gentleman has (and has signed) has no reference at all to a bond, he has no paperwork or correspondence relating to a bond. We do not, and never have, issued bonds.

2. With regards to investment into assets, we asked him to explain to us exactly what he thought he had invested in, after a long conversation, the following comment was made 'I thought I was investing in a company that had assets'. When it was explained to him that he did invest in a company that had assets, its just the assets have been de-valued due to the market (hence the 5 year plan to work to get other business live or wait for them to recover so they could be sold to repay the debt). The response was 'why don't you just tell the other investors that then?' .

This is the level of confusion that is going on, we have proved in our last post (the response to the FT) that we can back up with evidence and explain in intricate detail how this has panned out. There is also a lot of retrospective re-engineering of the narrative to suit, the many emails we have received of support show most of you realise this.

The point is, with the F.T article, other blog posts, and now this, please get your facts straight before deciding to blog. We are happy to discuss this with any one of you, in detail, hence the offer of a meeting (which the authors of the other blog have declined to attend).

There are rumours that we have secret offshore accounts and that we have cleverly masterminded this for our benefit. I would love to claim to be that clever but I am not hence why I am about to lose all of my assets and my businesses have failed. I'm sure at least this we can all agree on!

As we have always said, feel free to contact us via the usual methods, or come to the arranged meeting, we'll answer and explain everything in full and support it with evidence.

I cant stress how terribly sorry I am that it has come to this, I did not see it panning out this way at all. I implore you to contact me directly or attend the meeting should you have any questions, I'm happy to meet you individually if that's a better option for you.

Kind regards.